H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Vania King vs Michelle Larcher De Brito H2H: 0-1

Michelle Larcher De Brito holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Larcher De Brito leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michelle Larcher De Brito won the 2008 Canadian Open round of 64 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Michelle Larcher De Brito
Portugal Age 33 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michelle Larcher De Brito #169 2-6 6-3 6-3 Vania King #97 Match data Jul 30, 2008* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Michelle Larcher De Brito #1,216 #76 821 1,630 30 42 41.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vania King Michelle Larcher De Brito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #296 1,518 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2008 8–6 57.1% #130 1,616 0 0
16 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0 2009 5–7 41.7% #113 1,603 0 0
17 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1 2010 5–8 38.5% #210 1,571 0 0
18 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1 2012 3–6 33.3% #130 1,528 0 0
20 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1 2013 3–7 30.0% #117 1,508 0 0
21 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1 2014 2–5 28.6% #123 1,497 0 0
22 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1 2015 2–1 66.7% #226 1,530 0 0
23 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1 2016 1–1 50.0% #231 1,519 0 0
24 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Vania King Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — 15 27 42 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 11 8 19 57.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 237/288 of Vania King's and 53/72 of Michelle Larcher De Brito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Vania King Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 0.5 11.5 55.9% 56.7% 44.7% 51.3% 45.0% 51.4% 40.0%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 10/14 0.6 5.5 62.0% 57.5% 45.0% 53.1% 45.9% 52.5% 45.4%
16 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3% 2009 10/12 0.3 8.7 61.7% 56.7% 39.7% 45.7% 58.6% 50.2% 44.9%
17 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1% 2010 12/13 0.3 5.8 57.0% 55.8% 42.9% 50.3% 48.5% 50.7% 39.7%
18 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5% 2012 7/9 0.6 5.6 64.8% 53.2% 37.0% 47.6% 55.6% 47.5% 46.0%
20 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1% 2013 4/10 0.0 3.8 62.7% 53.0% 47.9% 43.9% 39.6% 51.2% 37.9%
21 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8% 2014 3/7 0.7 6.0 56.3% 58.2% 45.8% 59.1% 21.9% 52.9% 41.1%
22 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9% 2015 3/3 1.0 4.3 73.5% 56.7% 69.8% 49.6% 74.1% 60.0% 44.6%
23 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5% 2016 2/2 1.0 3.5 69.9% 59.3% 41.7% 55.0% 30.0% 54.2% 38.0%
24 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4% — 53/72 0.5 6.2 61.6% 56.1% 44.0% 49.8% 49.3% 51.4% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Vania King Michelle Larcher De Brito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 107.6 -2.05 +2.65 0.822 45.7% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.27
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1616 127.4 -1.08 +1.24 0.955 49.0% +27 — — 50.0% -0.21 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.01
16 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17 2009 1603 111.7 -2.92 -0.21 0.902 47.8% +1 -47 — 42.9% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.3 +0.35
17 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14 2010 1571 104.1 -2.73 -2.95 0.806 45.7% -18 0 +67 33.3% -0.97 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.26
18 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09 2012 1529 101.7 -3.16 -0.55 0.875 46.7% -20 — — 37.5% -0.67 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — +0.81
20 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36 2013 1509 106.8 -1.46 -0.63 0.776 44.9% -53 — +145 28.6% -1.43 1–0 1–1 — +0.34
21 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43 2014 1498 101.1 -0.50 +1.15 0.872 46.8% — — +212 33.3% -1.11 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.35
22 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31 2015 1530 108.6 +0.29 -0.81 1.116 52.2% — — +205 57.1% +0.43 1–0 1–0 — +0.22
23 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01 2016 1520 93.1 -1.26 -1.07 0.829 46.8% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.02
24 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53 2017 1502 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80 — 1630 112.2 -2.04 -0.51 0.879 47.3% -6 -24 +150 39.8% -0.73 19–10 (66%) 7–9 (44%) 106.7 +2.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.