H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vania King vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 0-1
Sofia Arvidsson holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sofia Arvidsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sofia Arvidsson won the 2010 Memphis fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2010* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sofia Arvidsson | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vania King | Sofia Arvidsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |