H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Vania King vs Zi Yan H2H: 0-2
Zi Yan holds a 2–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zi Yan leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zi Yan won the 2007 Bangkok quarterfinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 37
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2007* | Bangkok | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Zi Yan | (w/o) | Vania King | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2007* | Guangzhou | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Zi Yan | 6-4 7-6(5) | Vania King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vania King | #824 | #50 | 1,225 | 1,760 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vania King | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #76 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #69 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #85 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #111 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #410 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #78 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #492 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #356 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |