H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:17 UTC
Varvara Gracheva vs Viktorija Golubic H2H: 1-1
Varvara Gracheva and Viktorija Golubic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on clay, while Varvara Gracheva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Gracheva won the 2026 Australian Open first round 6-1 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 25
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Varvara Gracheva | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2022 | Rouen | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Viktorija Golubic | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Varvara Gracheva | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2022 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Varvara Gracheva | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varvara Gracheva | #95 | #39 | 1,290 | 1,833 | 85 | 117 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Varvara Gracheva | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #66 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #95 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |