H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 2-1

Venus Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Alisa Kleybanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on grass, while Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2010 Wimbledon third round 6-4 6-2.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
RUS Age 37 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Venus Williams #2 6-4 6-2 Alisa Kleybanova #27 Match data
May 14, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Alisa Kleybanova #26 6-3 3-6 7-5 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Jul 1, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Venus Williams #7 6-3 6-4 Alisa Kleybanova #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Alisa Kleybanova #784 #20 2,485 1,875 108 92 54.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Alisa Kleybanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #368 1,514 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #237 1,499 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #240 1,473 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2008 17–16 51.5% #32 1,636 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2009 31–24 56.4% #29 1,776 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2010 32–23 58.2% #25 1,825 0 2
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2011 14–12 53.8% #68 1,778 0 2
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2012 1–1 50.0% #545 1,774 0 2
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2013 4–4 50.0% #188 1,769 0 2
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2014 8–8 50.0% #139 1,766 0 2
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47