H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Alla Kudryavtseva H2H: 2-0

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Alla Kudryavtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2009 Stanford fourth round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Alla Kudryavtseva
RUS Age 38 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2009* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-1 7-5 Alla Kudryavtseva #100 Match data
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Venus Williams #31 2-6 6-3 7-5 Alla Kudryavtseva #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Alla Kudryavtseva #841 #56 1,056 1,670 85 138 38.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Alla Kudryavtseva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2006 4–4 50.0% #134 1,504 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2007 7–14 33.3% #77 1,479 0 0
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2008 12–18 40.0% #71 1,555 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2009 12–21 36.4% #89 1,568 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2010 18–21 46.2% #60 1,631 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2011 15–23 39.5% #103 1,569 0 1
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2012 2–6 25.0% #212 1,510 0 1
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2013 3–4 42.9% #170 1,506 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2014 5–13 27.8% #98 1,488 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2015 2–8 20.0% #175 1,452 0 1
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2016 5–3 62.5% #142 1,614 0 1
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2017 0–2 0.0% #356 1,534 0 1
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 — — — — — — —
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 — — — — — — —
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47 — — — — — — —