H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 5-4

Venus Williams holds a 5–4 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2005 Antwerp final 4-6 7-5 6-4.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2005* Antwerp WTA 500 F Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 4-6 7-5 6-4 Venus Williams #8 Match data
Nov 6, 2004* Philadelphia WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 7-5 5-7 6-1 Venus Williams #10 Match data
May 9, 2004* Berlin WTA 1000 F Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 (w/o) Venus Williams #11 Match data
May 4, 2003* Warsaw WTA 500 F Clay Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-7(6) 6-0 3-0 (ret.) Venus Williams #3 Match data
Sep 7, 2002* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Venus Williams #2 6-3 5-7 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #9 Match data
Feb 16, 2002* Antwerp WTA 500 SF Carpet Venus Williams #2 7-6(4) 6-0 Amélie Mauresmo #10 Match data
Feb 10, 2002* Paris WTA 500 SF Carpet Venus Williams #2 4-6 7-6(3) 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #8 Match data
Jan 24, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #3 6-2 3-6 6-3 Amélie Mauresmo #20 Match data
Jan 25, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Venus Williams #16 6-1 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47