H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Venus Williams vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 2-1

Venus Williams holds a 2–1 lead over Anna Chakvetadze in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on clay, while Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2009 Rome fourth round 6-0 6-7(8) 6-4.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2009* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Venus Williams #5 6-0 6-7(8) 6-4 Anna Chakvetadze #22 Match data
Aug 4, 2007* San Diego WTA 1000 QF Hard Anna Chakvetadze #6 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-2 Venus Williams #16 Match data
May 21, 2005* Istanbul WTA 500 QF Clay Venus Williams #13 6-2 6-1 Anna Chakvetadze #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,067 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,526 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,716 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,936 0 2
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,984 0 6
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,721 0 7
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,711 0 7
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,715 0 8
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,641 0 8
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,557 0 8
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47