H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Venus Williams vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 10-1

Venus Williams holds a 10–1 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 7–0 on hard courts and 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2011 Eastbourne Open quarterfinal 6-2 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
10 – 1
11 main-draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniela Hantuchova #25 6-2 5-7 6-2 Venus Williams #33 Match data Jun 18, 2011* QF Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Venus Williams #5 1-6 7-5 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #25 Match data Mar 31, 2010* R16 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #16 6-0 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #10 Match data Aug 3, 2007* R16 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #10 6-3 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #19 Match data Sep 3, 2005* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #16 7-5 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #28 Match data Jun 26, 2005* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Venus Williams #17 7-6(0) 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #36 Match data Mar 27, 2004* R32 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #2 6-1 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #5 Match data Feb 15, 2003* SF Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Venus Williams #2 6-4 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #8 Match data Jan 24, 2003* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #11 Match data Aug 24, 2002* SF New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Venus Williams #3 3-6 6-0 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #28 Match data Jan 20, 2002* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #2 6-3 6-2 Daniela Hantuchova #58 Match data Jun 29, 2001* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0
18 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1
24 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3
28 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6
32 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Venus Williams Daniela Hantuchova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
18 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4%
19 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
29 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8% — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 581/732 of Venus Williams's and 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Venus Williams Daniela Hantuchova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/49 2.1 2.6 61.5% 62.8% 53.0% 46.0% 45.9% 59.1% 46.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 8/50 2.6 3.0 59.5% 62.1% 44.2% 43.0% 64.2% 55.1% 40.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 15/63 4.0 3.2 58.2% 69.2% 46.3% 50.6% 45.0% 59.1% 47.9%
23 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3% 2006 42/60 3.4 2.7 63.8% 66.1% 44.7% 56.1% 46.8% 58.5% 42.5%
24 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1% 2007 74/78 3.5 2.6 65.4% 68.4% 47.9% 58.5% 49.2% 61.2% 45.2%
25 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1% 2008 36/42 2.1 2.2 64.4% 64.5% 45.8% 57.0% 50.2% 57.8% 43.5%
26 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5% 2009 57/61 2.4 2.4 63.3% 63.3% 46.3% 49.7% 49.1% 57.1% 43.5%
27 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6% 2010 49/56 2.7 2.6 64.9% 64.3% 46.9% 52.9% 49.4% 58.1% 43.8%
28 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0% 2011 64/66 3.2 2.6 62.8% 65.9% 49.7% 59.9% 47.6% 59.8% 45.0%
29 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1% 2012 38/47 2.4 3.7 62.2% 63.6% 45.7% 53.2% 51.4% 56.9% 41.3%
30 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4% 2013 42/47 2.6 3.4 60.9% 63.1% 43.8% 50.7% 46.6% 55.7% 41.8%
31 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7% 2014 37/40 2.3 3.8 62.5% 61.8% 44.7% 51.5% 43.1% 55.5% 41.5%
32 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0% 2015 32/34 2.1 3.9 66.6% 62.2% 47.7% 44.5% 46.3% 57.3% 39.7%
33 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2% 2016 9/10 2.4 3.4 60.6% 53.1% 39.7% 35.1% 52.9% 48.3% 38.7%
34 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7% 2017 2/2 3.0 5.5 65.7% 66.4% 37.9% 50.0% 39.2% 56.7% 41.9%
35 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
45 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
46 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0% — 512/826 2.8 2.9 63.4% 64.6% 46.5% 53.3% 48.3% 58.0% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Venus Williams Daniela Hantuchova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20
17 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04
18 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24
19 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09
20 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36
21 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74
22 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05
23 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07
24 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67
25 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80
26 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00
27 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22
28 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84
29 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10
30 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34
31 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28
32 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22
33 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58
34 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21
35 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45 — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.