H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 22:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 1-0

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2010 Acapulco fourth round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 2010* Acapulco WTA 250 R16 Clay Venus Williams #5 6-4 6-4 Kaia Kanepi #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47