H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Shahar Peer H2H: 6-0

Venus Williams holds a 6–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2010 US Open fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 0
6 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 7, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Venus Williams #4 7-6(3) 6-3 Shahar Peer #19 Match data
May 15, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 SF Clay Venus Williams #3 6-3 6-0 Shahar Peer #22 Match data
May 7, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Venus Williams #4 6-3 6-4 Shahar Peer #21 Match data
Feb 20, 2010* Dubai WTA 1000 SF Hard Venus Williams #5 6-1 6-4 Shahar Peer #22 Match data
Mar 25, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #6 6-3 6-3 Shahar Peer #46 Match data
Feb 25, 2007* Memphis WTA 500 F Hard Venus Williams #54 6-1 6-1 Shahar Peer #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47