H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Venus Williams vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 3-1

Venus Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2016 Kaohsiung round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Urszula Radwanska
Poland Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Venus Williams #12 6-4 6-2 Urszula Radwanska #113 Match data Feb 12, 2016* R16 Kaohsiung International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Venus Williams #16 6-3 6-2 Urszula Radwanska #123 Match data Mar 27, 2015* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Urszula Radwanska #40 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 Venus Williams #32 Match data May 29, 2013* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Venus Williams #13 6-3 6-3 Urszula Radwanska #502 Match data May 4, 2006* R32 Warsaw Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49
Urszula Radwanska #493 #29 1,565 1,746 100 131 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Urszula Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 2006 2–3 40.0% #313 1,525 0 0
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0 2007 3–3 50.0% #252 1,539 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #129 1,516 0 0
18 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3 2009 16–22 42.1% #70 1,555 0 0
19 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9 2010 1–3 25.0% #193 1,551 0 0
20 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15 2011 10–11 47.6% #105 1,575 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21 2012 27–25 51.9% #31 1,710 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28 2013 21–23 47.7% #40 1,700 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29 2014 3–11 21.4% #179 1,594 0 0
24 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31 2015 12–15 44.4% #94 1,579 0 0
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33 2016 2–5 28.6% #257 1,531 0 0
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33 — — — — — — —
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36 — — — — — — —
28 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39 — — — — — — —
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41 — — — — — — —
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43 2021 0–4 0.0% #231 1,452 0 0
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43 — — — — — — —
32 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44 — — — — — — —
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44 — — — — — — —
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Venus Williams Urszula Radwanska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2011 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 17 17 34 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
22 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2016 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2021 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8% — 75 91 166 45.2% 9 23 32 28.1% 16 16 32 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 581/732 of Venus Williams's and 200/226 of Urszula Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Venus Williams Urszula Radwanska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/6 1.5 3.8 64.3% 55.8% 45.7% 50.0% 48.7% 52.4% 48.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 4/9 1.3 3.5 59.3% 56.9% 33.2% 47.1% 47.8% 47.0% 42.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 34/38 2.2 2.6 61.6% 60.4% 41.4% 49.8% 45.7% 53.2% 43.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/4 0.7 1.3 63.0% 52.2% 49.3% 55.6% 33.3% 51.5% 40.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 18/21 1.7 2.4 63.9% 59.7% 46.4% 47.9% 46.4% 54.8% 46.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 49/52 2.0 2.4 65.4% 60.6% 42.6% 50.7% 48.2% 54.2% 45.3%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 42/44 1.6 2.1 66.3% 56.2% 43.8% 49.5% 50.6% 52.1% 45.3%
23 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3% 2014 14/14 0.8 2.9 62.6% 54.9% 41.5% 37.6% 52.7% 49.8% 43.6%
24 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1% 2015 21/27 1.6 2.5 67.3% 57.1% 45.4% 46.9% 51.4% 52.9% 43.0%
25 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1% 2016 7/7 1.3 4.1 58.3% 52.7% 49.6% 30.9% 43.8% 51.8% 45.2%
26 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4% 2021 4/4 1.8 4.3 60.3% 51.2% 47.7% 51.6% 26.2% 49.9% 33.4%
31 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
45 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0% — 200/231 1.7 2.5 64.3% 58.0% 43.5% 48.0% 48.0% 52.8% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Venus Williams Urszula Radwanska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31 2006 1525 115.3 — — — — — +24 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — -0.64
16 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34 2007 1539 110.6 -1.56 -0.20 1.009 50.0% +22 — — 57.1% +0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.39
17 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92 2008 1517 107.6 -2.91 -0.90 0.806 45.0% +3 — — 40.0% -0.45 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.54
18 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82 2009 1555 121.6 -1.78 -0.41 0.921 48.0% -11 -56 +108 42.5% -0.65 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 108.8 +0.15
19 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08 2010 1552 113.9 +0.83 +2.32 0.833 46.6% -5 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.32
20 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30 2011 1575 116.1 -1.08 +0.22 1.028 50.6% +16 -91 — 48.1% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 +1.19
21 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53 2012 1710 130.1 -1.38 +2.06 0.990 49.6% -35 -192 -2 49.1% -0.05 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.60
22 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34 2013 1700 138.3 -2.18 +1.30 0.945 48.6% +10 -144 -15 44.9% -0.39 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 111.9 -1.35
23 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73 2014 1595 109.0 -3.72 -0.43 0.869 47.1% +59 -95 — 25.9% -1.56 0–3 (0%) — — -1.04
24 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68 2015 1579 115.7 -3.71 +0.71 0.914 47.8% +43 — +45 45.0% -0.53 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 102.8 -0.35
25 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36 2016 1532 111.4 -0.85 +0.76 0.939 48.4% +53 — — 42.9% -0.07 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.48
26 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08 2017 1519 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59 2018 1506 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46 2019 1484 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55 2020 1466 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82 2021 1453 105.6 -1.63 -4.19 0.666 42.3% +42 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.17
31 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19 2022 1441 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94 2023 1428 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63 2024 1441 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59 2025 1426 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59 2026 1432 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45 — 1747 127.6 -1.98 +0.73 0.940 48.6% +7 -111 +29 43.8% -0.43 31–31 (50%) 25–20 (56%) 106.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.