H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Venus Williams vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 3-1

Venus Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2009 Dubai final 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams

USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H

3 – 1

4 main draw meetings

Virginie Razzano

FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Feb 22, 2009*	Dubai	WTA 1000	F	Hard	Venus Williams #6	6-4 6-2	Virginie Razzano #58	Match data
Oct 7, 2007*	Japan Open	WTA 500	F	Hard	Virginie Razzano #33	4-6 7-6(7) 6-4	Venus Williams #8	Match data
Aug 2, 2007*	San Diego	WTA 1000	R32	Hard	Venus Williams #16	6-2 6-4	Virginie Razzano #59	Match data
Feb 18, 2005*	Antwerp	WTA 500	R16	Hard	Venus Williams #8	6-3 6-0	Virginie Razzano #59	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Venus Williams	#467	#1	7,452	2,362	768	288	72.7%	7	9	1	20	10	47
Virginie Razzano	#1,226	#16	2,420	1,876	200	216	48.1%	0	0	0	2	0	2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Venus Williams							Virginie Razzano
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	1994	1–1	50.0%	—	1,525	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1995	2–3	40.0%	#205	1,561	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1996	2–5	28.6%	#216	1,571	0	0	1999	0–1	0.0%	#344	1,483	0	0
17	1997	20–13	60.6%	#22	1,851	0	0	2000	3–4	42.9%	#143	1,507	0	0
18	1998	50–13	79.4%	#5	2,094	0	2	2001	10–12	45.5%	#87	1,589	0	0
19	1999	57–11	83.8%	#3	2,258	0	8	2002	11–12	47.8%	#76	1,662	0	0
20	2000	35–4	89.7%	#3	2,321	2	13	2003	15–20	42.9%	#72	1,613	0	0
21	2001	46–6	88.5%	#3	2,338	4	19	2004	7–8	46.7%	#60	1,604	0	0
22	2002	63–9	87.5%	#2	2,297	4	26	2005	16–22	42.1%	#51	1,608	0	0
23	2003	24–5	82.8%	#11	2,257	4	27	2006	10–18	35.7%	#88	1,595	0	0
24	2004	40–13	75.5%	#9	2,072	4	29	2007	34–20	63.0%	#28	1,805	0	2
25	2005	34–10	77.3%	#10	2,085	5	31	2008	14–20	41.2%	#58	1,633	0	2
26	2006	13–6	68.4%	#46	2,007	5	31	2009	31–20	60.8%	#19	1,801	0	2
27	2007	46–10	82.1%	#8	2,048	6	34	2010	9–15	37.5%	#113	1,660	0	2
28	2008	37–10	78.7%	#6	2,133	7	37	2011	13–13	50.0%	#83	1,681	0	2
29	2009	38–16	70.4%	#6	1,981	7	39	2012	5–9	35.7%	#160	1,633	0	2
30	2010	38–7	84.4%	#5	2,057	7	41	2013	9–8	52.9%	#99	1,683	0	2
31	2011	8–4	66.7%	#102	1,994	7	41	2014	4–8	33.3%	#165	1,621	0	2
32	2012	22–8	73.3%	#24	2,007	7	42	2015	4–2	66.7%	#200	1,657	0	2
33	2013	15–11	57.7%	#47	1,889	7	42	2016	5–4	55.6%	#169	1,647	0	2
34	2014	33–15	68.8%	#18	1,874	7	43	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2015	39–14	73.6%	#7	1,957	7	46	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2016	24–14	63.2%	#17	1,830	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2017	38–15	71.7%	#5	1,935	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	2018	15–11	57.7%	#39	1,867	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2019	20–15	57.1%	#52	1,827	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	2020	1–8	11.1%	#79	1,717	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	2021	3–9	25.0%	#318	1,649	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42	2022	0–4	0.0%	#1000	1,603	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
43	2023	3–7	30.0%	#412	1,594	7	47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—