H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Venus Williams vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 3-1

Venus Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2009 Dubai Tennis Championships final 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Venus Williams #6 6-4 6-2 Virginie Razzano #58 Match data Feb 21, 2009* F Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Virginie Razzano #33 4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Venus Williams #8 Match data Oct 7, 2007* F Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Venus Williams #16 6-2 6-4 Virginie Razzano #59 Match data Aug 2, 2007* R32 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #8 6-3 6-0 Virginie Razzano #59 Match data Feb 18, 2005* R16 Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Venus Williams Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0
18 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0
19 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0
20 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0
21 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0
22 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0
23 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0
24 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2
25 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2
26 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2
27 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2
28 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2
29 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2
32 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2
33 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45 — — — — — — —
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48 — — — — — — —
36 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49 — — — — — — —
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49 — — — — — — —
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49 — — — — — — —
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49 — — — — — — —
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49 — — — — — — —
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49 — — — — — — —
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49 — — — — — — —
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Venus Williams Virginie Razzano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
34 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8% — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 581/732 of Venus Williams's and 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Venus Williams Virginie Razzano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0%
23 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3% 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7%
24 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1% 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1%
25 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1% 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0%
26 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5% 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8%
27 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6% 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9%
28 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0% 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5%
29 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1% 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7%
30 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4% 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1%
31 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7% 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7%
32 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0% 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5%
33 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2% 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0%
34 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
45 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
46 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0% — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Venus Williams Virginie Razzano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23
17 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38
18 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70
19 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19
20 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11
21 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44
22 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08
23 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
24 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70
25 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98
26 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77
27 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13
28 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70
29 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93
30 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32
31 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40
32 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16
33 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64
34 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45 — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.