H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Vera Dushevina vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Vera Dushevina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2007 Dubai fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Dushevina
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 23, 2007* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-2 6-2 Vera Dushevina #115 Match data
May 31, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-1 7-6(5) Vera Dushevina #42 Match data
May 11, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-1 6-2 Vera Dushevina #47 Match data
Feb 10, 2006* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-2 Vera Dushevina #46 Match data
Jun 17, 2005* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Vera Dushevina #54 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Dushevina #741 #31 1,490 1,786 143 172 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Dushevina Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–1 0.0% #473 1,485 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2003 5–4 55.6% #113 1,552 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2004 12–16 42.9% #63 1,590 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2005 19–19 50.0% #40 1,657 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2006 12–22 35.3% #97 1,609 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2007 19–15 55.9% #40 1,747 0 0 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2008 12–17 41.4% #89 1,681 0 0 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2009 24–18 57.1% #43 1,762 0 1 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2010 19–19 50.0% #54 1,757 0 1 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2011 12–17 41.4% #86 1,724 0 1 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2012 5–15 25.0% #146 1,534 0 1 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2013 4–8 33.3% #124 1,554 0 1 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2014 0–1 0.0% #463 1,541 0 1 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 — — — — — — — 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25