H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 2-2
Vera Dushevina and Anna-Lena Groenefeld are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Vera Dushevina leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Eastbourne fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2006* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 6-1 | Vera Dushevina | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Vera Dushevina | 7-5 6-4 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2005* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 7-5 6-4 | Vera Dushevina | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2004* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vera Dushevina | 6-3 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vera Dushevina | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |