H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Vera Dushevina vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 0-2
Ksenia Pervak holds a 2–0 lead over Vera Dushevina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ksenia Pervak leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2012 Luxembourg third round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2012* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 6-3 7-6(2) | Vera Dushevina | Match data |
| May 3, 2012* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ksenia Pervak | 6-1 5-7 7-6(6) | Vera Dushevina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Dushevina | #741 | #31 | 1,490 | 1,786 | 143 | 172 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Dushevina | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #113 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #40 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #86 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |