H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-7

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 7–1 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Eastbourne third round 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 7
8 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 2009* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #17 6-3 1-6 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #7 Match data
Oct 11, 2007* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #24 4-6 6-3 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #11 Match data
May 14, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-2 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #10 Match data
Nov 10, 2004 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-1 6-0 Vera Zvonareva #11 Match data
Nov 7, 2004* Philadelphia WTA 500 F Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 3-6 6-2 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #11 Match data
Aug 7, 2004* Montreal WTA 1000 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #3 7-6(6) 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #14 Match data
May 15, 2004* Rome WTA 1000 SF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-2 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #12 Match data
Oct 4, 2003* Moscow WTA 1000 QF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #7 6-4 3-6 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 — — — — — — — 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —