H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Vera Zvonareva vs Chia-Jung Chuang H2H: 1-0
Vera Zvonareva holds a 1–0 lead over Chia-Jung Chuang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Zvonareva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2008 Charleston second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2008* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Vera Zvonareva | 6-2 6-2 | Chia-Jung Chuang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
| Chia-Jung Chuang | #752 | #177 | 175 | 1,514 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vera Zvonareva | Chia-Jung Chuang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #744 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |