H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 3-2

Vera Zvonareva holds a 3–2 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2011 Moscow quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 2011* Moscow WTA 500 QF Hard Dominika Cibulkova #20 4-6 6-4 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #5 Match data
Mar 10, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #27 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #3 Match data
Feb 25, 2011* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #3 6-1 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #27 Match data
Aug 5, 2010* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #9 6-0 3-6 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #42 Match data
Oct 11, 2008* Moscow WTA 1000 QF Hard Vera Zvonareva #9 7-5 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —