H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 5-1

Vera Zvonareva holds a 5–1 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 2–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Tokyo fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 2011* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #4 6-1 6-2 Iveta Benesova #56 Match data
Jan 26, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #2 6-4 6-1 Iveta Benesova #60 Match data
Jan 21, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Vera Zvonareva #9 6-0 6-3 Iveta Benesova #45 Match data
May 15, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Vera Zvonareva #13 7-5 4-6 7-5 Iveta Benesova #83 Match data
Apr 14, 2005* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Iveta Benesova #51 6-4 4-6 7-5 Vera Zvonareva #10 Match data
Jul 11, 2002* Palermo WTA 250 R32 Clay Vera Zvonareva #84 6-2 7-6(5) Iveta Benesova #113 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —