H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 3-5

Nadia Petrova holds a 5–3 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Toronto third round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #3 7-5 6-4 Nadia Petrova #28 Match data
Jan 27, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #7 7-5 6-4 Nadia Petrova #11 Match data
Jul 25, 2008* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #17 6-4 7-5 Vera Zvonareva #11 Match data
Feb 16, 2007* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 7-6(2) 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #21 Match data
Oct 14, 2006* Moscow WTA 1000 QF Carpet Nadia Petrova #5 7-5 6-1 Vera Zvonareva #29 Match data
May 11, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #4 6-1 7-6(3) Vera Zvonareva #40 Match data
Nov 6, 2004* Philadelphia WTA 500 SF Hard Vera Zvonareva #11 6-3 7-6(2) Nadia Petrova #14 Match data
Jun 5, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Nadia Petrova #76 6-1 4-6 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —