H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Paola Suarez H2H: 3-2

Vera Zvonareva holds a 3–2 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Vera Zvonareva leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2006 Pattaya third round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Paola Suarez
ARG Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2006* Pattaya WTA 250 R32 Hard Paola Suarez #319 6-1 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #33 Match data
Jan 5, 2006* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #42 6-2 6-3 Paola Suarez #238 Match data
Aug 11, 2003 Toronto WTA 1000 QF Hard Paola Suarez #32 2-6 6-2 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #16 Match data
Apr 11, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Vera Zvonareva #33 6-4 6-4 Paola Suarez #27 Match data
Jul 13, 2002* Palermo WTA 250 SF Clay Vera Zvonareva #84 7-5 (ret.) Paola Suarez #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Paola Suarez #525 #9 2,081 1,916 223 180 55.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Paola Suarez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #197 1,519 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 1994 5–8 38.5% #114 1,536 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 1995 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 1996 12–11 52.2% #62 1,618 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 1997 6–16 27.3% #118 1,556 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 1998 10–9 52.6% #80 1,535 0 1
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 1999 12–12 50.0% #72 1,597 0 1
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2000 27–22 55.1% #36 1,677 0 1
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2001 27–15 64.3% #27 1,736 0 2
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2002 30–23 56.6% #27 1,697 0 2
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2003 37–22 62.7% #14 1,859 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2004 37–17 68.5% #16 1,804 0 4
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2005 3–7 30.0% #238 1,712 0 4
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2006 10–9 52.6% #178 1,699 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2007 3–2 60.0% #300 1,689 0 4
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —