H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 4-3

Vera Zvonareva holds a 4–3 lead over Petra Kvitova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Petra Kvitova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2021 Rome third round 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2021* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Vera Zvonareva #113 6-4 3-6 6-4 Petra Kvitova #10 Match data
Oct 24, 2011 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Petra Kvitova #3 6-2 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #6 Match data
Oct 1, 2011* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Hard Vera Zvonareva #4 7-6(2) 6-0 Petra Kvitova #6 Match data
May 6, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Petra Kvitova #18 6-1 6-4 Vera Zvonareva #3 Match data
Jan 28, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Vera Zvonareva #2 6-2 6-4 Petra Kvitova #28 Match data
May 5, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Petra Kvitova #62 6-4 6-0 Vera Zvonareva #20 Match data
Mar 12, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #6 6-3 6-1 Petra Kvitova #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 — — — — — — — 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 — — — — — — — 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —