H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 4-1

Vera Zvonareva holds a 4–1 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Vera Zvonareva leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Dubai third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2011* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #3 6-3 6-1 Roberta Vinci #37 Match data
Oct 1, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Vera Zvonareva #4 6-4 6-0 Roberta Vinci #60 Match data
Aug 20, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #7 6-3 6-3 Roberta Vinci #45 Match data
May 3, 2008* Prague WTA 250 QF Clay Vera Zvonareva #13 6-1 6-2 Roberta Vinci #191 Match data
Jun 17, 2005* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Roberta Vinci #111 6-2 7-6(5) Vera Zvonareva #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —