H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Vera Zvonareva vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 1-8
Samantha Stosur holds a 8–1 lead over Vera Zvonareva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Samantha Stosur leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Samantha Stosur won the 2011 US Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
8
9 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 6-3 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2011* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Samantha Stosur | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2011* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Samantha Stosur | 6-0 6-3 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2010* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-2 7-5 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2008* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-3 6-2 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2007* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Samantha Stosur | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2007* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Samantha Stosur | 6-1 6-4 | Vera Zvonareva | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Vera Zvonareva | 6-4 6-4 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vera Zvonareva | Samantha Stosur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 |
| 33 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 |
| 34 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 |
| 35 | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 |
| 36 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 |
| 37 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 |
| 38 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 |
| 41 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |