H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Vera Zvonareva vs Tsvetana Pironkova H2H: 2-2

Vera Zvonareva and Tsvetana Pironkova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Tokyo third round 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Vera Zvonareva
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Tsvetana Pironkova
BUL Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 2011* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Vera Zvonareva #4 7-5 6-0 Tsvetana Pironkova #45 Match data
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tsvetana Pironkova #33 6-2 6-3 Vera Zvonareva #3 Match data
Jul 2, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Vera Zvonareva #21 3-6 6-3 6-2 Tsvetana Pironkova #82 Match data
Oct 23, 2009* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Tsvetana Pironkova #126 6-0 6-2 Vera Zvonareva #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Vera Zvonareva #307 #2 7,935 2,077 459 268 63.1% 0 1 0 5 6 12
Tsvetana Pironkova #1,170 #31 1,805 1,770 169 222 43.2% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Vera Zvonareva Tsvetana Pironkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2000 1–1 50.0% #349 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 19–11 63.3% #45 1,680 0 0 2005 6–3 66.7% #86 1,599 0 0
18 2003 45–22 67.2% #13 1,849 0 1 2006 15–16 48.4% #64 1,662 0 0
19 2004 54–27 66.7% #11 1,935 0 2 2007 7–15 31.8% #95 1,596 0 0
20 2005 21–21 50.0% #42 1,683 0 3 2008 15–17 46.9% #44 1,631 0 0
21 2006 37–22 62.7% #24 1,884 0 5 2009 9–20 31.0% #97 1,546 0 0
22 2007 30–14 68.2% #22 1,935 0 5 2010 16–15 51.6% #35 1,623 0 0
23 2008 58–22 72.5% #7 2,005 0 7 2011 13–22 37.1% #46 1,644 0 0
24 2009 34–14 70.8% #9 1,916 0 9 2012 19–23 45.2% #42 1,658 0 0
25 2010 49–18 73.1% #2 2,051 0 10 2013 9–21 30.0% #108 1,561 0 0
26 2011 54–22 71.1% #7 1,946 0 12 2014 17–19 47.2% #38 1,619 0 1
27 2012 9–9 50.0% #95 1,808 0 12 2015 18–21 46.2% #59 1,633 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2016 10–12 45.5% #64 1,671 0 1
29 2014 3–5 37.5% #251 1,743 0 12 2017 6–10 37.5% #165 1,639 0 1
30 2015 7–8 46.7% #185 1,671 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2017 3–1 75.0% #200 1,676 0 12 2020 6–2 75.0% #136 1,739 0 1
33 2018 6–9 40.0% #109 1,702 0 12 2021 3–6 33.3% #252 1,706 0 1
34 2019 6–7 46.2% #159 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 2020 4–6 40.0% #164 1,731 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–11 50.0% #81 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2022 3–8 27.3% #357 1,711 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2023 4–8 33.3% #272 1,683 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 2026 1–2 33.3% #307 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —