H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Vera Zvonareva vs Zi Yan H2H: 1-0
Vera Zvonareva holds a 1–0 lead over Zi Yan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Zvonareva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Vera Zvonareva | 6-2 6-0 | Zi Yan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vera Zvonareva | #285 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,089 | 466 | 270 | 63.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,620 | 34 | 58 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vera Zvonareva | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,886 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,938 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 63–23 | 73.3% | #7 | 2,024 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #95 | 1,847 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,773 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,688 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,689 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,733 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,719 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,687 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #285 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |