H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Veronica Cepede Royg vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 1-0
Veronica Cepede Royg holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Veronica Cepede Royg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Veronica Cepede Royg won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-7(4) 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 34
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2016 | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Veronica Cepede Royg | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronica Cepede Royg | #917 | #73 | 820 | 1,692 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Veronica Cepede Royg | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #138 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |