H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Vicki Nelson vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 2-1
Vicki Nelson holds a 2–1 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Vicki Nelson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Vicki Nelson won the 1985 Amelia Island second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1985* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Vicki Nelson | 7-5 6-3 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1984* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-3 7-5 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1983* | Tokyo Queen's | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Vicki Nelson | 6-1 6-3 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Vicki Nelson | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |