H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Timea Babos H2H: 0-2
Timea Babos holds a 2–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Timea Babos leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2017 US Open first round 7-5 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2020 | Adelaide | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Viktorija Golubic | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | Timea Babos | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Timea Babos | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2016* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Timea Babos | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |