H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Virginia Caceres vs Maria Teresa Riedl H2H: 0-1

Maria Teresa Riedl holds a 1–0 lead over Virginia Caceres in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Teresa Riedl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Teresa Riedl won the 1968 Reggio Calabria quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Caceres
PER Age 85
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Teresa Riedl
ITA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Teresa Riedl 7-5 7-5 Virginia Caceres Match data May 4, 1968* QF Reggio Calabria WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Caceres — — — 1,543 12 17 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maria Teresa Riedl — — — 1,613 16 10 61.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Caceres Maria Teresa Riedl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
26 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — 1968 9–6 60.0% — 1,572 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1969 7–4 63.6% — 1,613 0 2

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Caceres Maria Teresa Riedl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
26 1968 1464 99.5 — — — — — -19 — 42.2% -0.78 5–5 (50%) — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1572 115.4 — — — — — +57 — 62.5% +0.84 2–2 (50%) — — +0.30
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1613 115.6 — — — — — +65 — 59.3% +0.93 3–2 (60%) — — +1.25
Career — 1543 99.6 — — — — — -19 — 42.2% -0.78 5–5 (50%) — — +1.07 — 1613 115.5 — — — — — +60 — 61.0% +0.88 5–4 (56%) — — +6.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.