H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruano Pascual vs Myriam Casanova H2H: 0-1

Myriam Casanova holds a 1–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Myriam Casanova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Myriam Casanova won the 2002 Brussels semifinal 6-2 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Myriam Casanova
SUI Age 41 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Myriam Casanova #119 6-2 3-6 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #85 Match data Jul 13, 2002* SF Brussels Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Myriam Casanova #936 #45 749 1,728 27 30 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Myriam Casanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0 2002 15–6 71.4% #54 1,699 0 1
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0 2003 8–16 33.3% #103 1,640 0 1
19 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0 2004 4–8 33.3% #120 1,624 0 1
20 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Myriam Casanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 4 4 8 50.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 3 7 10 30.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6% — 9 17 26 34.6% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruano Pascual Myriam Casanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24 2002 1699 128.8 — — — — -105 +22 -51 59.6% +0.52 9–1 (90%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.62
18 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36 2003 1641 140.6 +1.08 +0.44 0.923 48.6% -22 +33 — 36.8% -0.69 4–5 (44%) 0–2 — -2.35
19 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39 2004 1625 117.3 -1.09 +1.22 0.997 49.8% -55 +74 — 36.7% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
20 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29 — 1729 134.5 -0.13 +0.87 0.967 49.3% -53 +34 -51 45.3% -0.22 16–9 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 105.3 -3.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.