H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruzici vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 1-2
Anne Hobbs holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruzici in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on carpet, while Virginia Ruzici leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1981 Brighton third round 4-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1981* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Hobbs | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| Jun 3, 1979* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-4 6-0 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1978* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Anne Hobbs | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruzici | Anne Hobbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |