H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruzici vs Christiane Jolissaint H2H: 3-1
Virginia Ruzici holds a 3–1 lead over Christiane Jolissaint in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Virginia Ruzici leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Christiane Jolissaint won the 1984 Hilton Head fourth round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Age 64
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1984* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Christiane Jolissaint | 6-1 7-5 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| May 7, 1981* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 6-0 | Christiane Jolissaint | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1980* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 7-5 | Christiane Jolissaint | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1980* | Deerfield Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 6-2 | Christiane Jolissaint | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Christiane Jolissaint | — | — | — | 1,754 | 95 | 131 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruzici | Christiane Jolissaint | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 | 1985 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 | 1987 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |