H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Virginia Ruzici vs Marita Redondo H2H: 3-1
Virginia Ruzici holds a 3–1 lead over Marita Redondo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1980 Los Angeles fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Age 70
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1980* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Ruzici | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1979* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Ruzici | 6-4 6-2 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1976* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 6-2 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1973* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marita Redondo | 6-4-6-2 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruzici | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |