H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Virginia Ruzici vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-2

Pam Casale holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruzici in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1983 Lugano round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale 6-1 6-4 Virginia Ruzici Match data May 12, 1983* R32 Lugano WTA 250 Clay
Pam Casale 7-6 6-3 Virginia Ruzici Match data Aug 29, 1981* QF Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Virginia Ruzici 7-5 6-1 Pam Casale Match data Aug 7, 1981* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Ruzici Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17 — — — — — — —
28 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18 — — — — — — —
29 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18 — — — — — — —
30 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19 — — — — — — —
32 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginia Ruzici Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginia Ruzici Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.