H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Ruzici vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-2
Pam Casale holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruzici in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1983 Lugano third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1983* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Pam Casale | 6-1 6-4 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1981* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Pam Casale | 7-6 6-3 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1981* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 7-5 6-1 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Ruzici | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |