H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginia Wade vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-2

Pam Shriver holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Wade in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1985 Wimbledon third round 6-2 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginia Wade
GBR Age 81 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 1985* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Pam Shriver #5 6-2 5-7 6-2 Virginia Wade #62 Match data
Mar 22, 1984* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver #3 7-5 6-4 Virginia Wade #49 Match data
Mar 8, 1980* Dallas WTA 250 QF Carpet Virginia Wade 7-6 (ret.) Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginia Wade #138 #40 — 2,313 865 314 73.4% 3 2 0 2 51 58
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginia Wade Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 — — — — — — — 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 — — — — — — — 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 — — — — — — — 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1968 85–19 81.7% — 1,945 1 9 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1969 82–18 82.0% — 2,118 1 16 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1970 69–22 75.8% — 2,080 1 21 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1971 64–16 80.0% — 2,161 1 29 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1972 75–23 76.5% — 2,151 2 34 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1973 63–16 79.7% — 2,158 2 40 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1974 60–16 78.9% — 2,189 2 45 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1975 65–14 82.3% — 2,313 2 51 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1976 48–17 73.8% — 2,256 2 53 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1977 50–18 73.5% — 2,274 3 55 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1978 69–25 73.4% — 2,240 3 58 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1979 51–26 66.2% — 2,088 3 58 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1980 30–21 58.8% — 1,885 3 58 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24
35 1981 25–21 54.3% — 1,824 3 58 — — — — — — —
36 1982 6–13 31.6% — 1,749 3 58 — — — — — — —
37 1983 10–9 52.6% — 1,788 3 58 — — — — — — —
38 1984 6–11 35.3% #61 1,728 3 58 — — — — — — —
39 1985 7–9 43.8% #62 1,712 3 58 — — — — — — —