H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 1-1

Virginie Razzano and Amanda Coetzer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2002 Luxembourg round of 16 6-3 6-0.

France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #93 6-3 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data Oct 25, 2002* R16 Luxembourg Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Amanda Coetzer #17 6-4 6-4 Virginie Razzano #101 Match data Mar 6, 2002 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 2015 4 2 6 66.7% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
Career 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 7/51 of Amanda Coetzer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Amanda Coetzer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% —/—
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% —/—
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% —/—
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% —/—
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% —/—
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% —/—
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% —/—
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% —/—
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% —/—
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% —/—
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% —/—
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% 2003 5/46 0.6 2.6 67.1% 60.3% 44.8% 58.0% 41.1% 55.6% 43.5%
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% 2004 2/5 0.0 1.0 71.5% 51.7% 48.7% 53.3% 75.0% 50.9% 54.3%
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% —/—
Career 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% 7/807 0.4 2.1 68.3% 57.8% 45.9% 56.7% 50.8% 54.2% 46.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 0.0% -2.50 +0.23 1988 1537 112.0 +42 63.6% +0.55 0–1 +0.21
17 2000 1481 108.1 +65 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 1989 1674 132.8 -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21
18 2001 1579 126.2 -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1990 1662 126.6 +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00
19 2002 1658 129.3 -42 -61 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 1991 1685 139.7 -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 1992 1865 153.9 -32 +16 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 1993 1994 160.0 +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 1994 1886 153.6 -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 1995 1907 160.6 0 +74 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 1996 1856 161.7 +2 +111 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 1997 2014 167.3 -43 +103 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 1998 1888 157.3 +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 -0.13 1999 1816 156.1 +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 2000 1895 157.2 -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 -0.93 2001 1786 143.1 -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 2002 1795 147.3 +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% +28 75.0% +2.13 2–0 -0.16 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 36.4% -0.36 1–0 -0.28
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% +40 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 -0.64
34 2017 1581 95.0
35 2018 1572 98.9
Career 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.