H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 1-1

Virginie Razzano and Amanda Coetzer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2002 Luxembourg fourth round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 2002* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Hard Virginie Razzano #93 6-3 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data
Mar 8, 2002* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amanda Coetzer #17 6-4 6-4 Virginie Razzano #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —