H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-2

Virginie Razzano and Anabel Medina Garrigues are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 2–1 on clay, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2009 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Virginie Razzano #36 6-2 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 Match data
Aug 25, 2005* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 6-4 6-2 Virginie Razzano #37 Match data
Jul 12, 2003* Palermo WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #139 2-6 6-1 7-6(3) Virginie Razzano #60 Match data
Apr 11, 2003* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Virginie Razzano #65 4-6 6-4 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #174 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —