H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 1-4

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 4–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2009 Cincinnati second round 6-3 3-6 6-4.

FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2009* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anna-Lena Groenefeld #50 6-3 3-6 6-4 Virginie Razzano #19 Match data
Feb 15, 2007* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #85 6-4 6-1 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #19 Match data
May 17, 2006* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anna-Lena Groenefeld #14 6-2 4-6 6-4 Virginie Razzano #62 Match data
Oct 13, 2005* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Anna-Lena Groenefeld #21 3-6 7-5 6-1 Virginie Razzano #46 Match data
Sep 1, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Anna-Lena Groenefeld #31 3-6 6-3 6-4 Virginie Razzano #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Virginie Razzano Anna-Lena Groenefeld
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0
2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0
2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,786 0 0
2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1
2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1
2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,596 0 1
2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1
2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1
2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1
2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2