H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Anne-Gaelle Sidot H2H: 1-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Anne-Gaelle Sidot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2001 Los Angeles round of 64 3-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anne-Gaelle Sidot
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #83 3-6 6-2 6-4 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #63 Match data Aug 8, 2001* R64 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anne-Gaelle Sidot #252 #24 1,128 1,750 90 125 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne-Gaelle Sidot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1996 6–6 50.0% #50 1,597 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 1997 22–24 47.8% #33 1,692 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1998 10–21 32.3% #54 1,631 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #34 1,718 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 2000 25–27 48.1% #35 1,701 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 2001 9–19 32.1% #120 1,545 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #246 1,545 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne-Gaelle Sidot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 6 7 13 46.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 6 9 15 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 10 13 23 43.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 3 8 11 27.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 37 49 86 43.0% 17 34 51 33.3% 10 14 24 41.7% 26 28 54 48.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne-Gaelle Sidot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 1996 1597 133.0 — — — — +35 — — 51.7% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.18
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 1997 1693 138.3 — — — — +13 -135 -95 47.1% -0.05 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.7 +1.11
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1998 1631 132.5 — — — — +58 -136 — 40.0% -0.72 4–9 (31%) 5–5 (50%) 96.0 -0.06
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 1999 1719 146.5 — — — — +41 -201 -192 41.1% -0.56 11–10 (52%) 1–6 (14%) 99.6 -1.64
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 2000 1702 140.3 — — — — +4 -101 -100 48.1% -0.22 13–12 (52%) 7–11 (39%) 101.9 +0.58
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 2001 1545 124.1 — — — — +82 -35 +65 37.3% -0.66 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 +0.66
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 2002 1546 106.7 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–1 — +0.01
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1750 142.8 — — — — +33 -129 -77 44.0% -0.36 41–49 (46%) 24–34 (41%) 97.7 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.