H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 2-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2010 Luxembourg third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2010* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Anne Keothavong #143 6-1 6-4 Virginie Razzano #116 Match data
Jan 16, 2009* Hobart WTA 250 R16 Hard Virginie Razzano #62 4-6 6-0 7-5 Anne Keothavong #53 Match data
Jun 26, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Virginie Razzano #99 6-3 7-6(5) Anne Keothavong #290 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 89 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne Keothavong
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,485 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,467 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,463 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,539 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,618 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2012 6–17 26.1% #143 1,532 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,485 0 0
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —