H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 2-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2010 Luxembourg round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Keothavong #143 6-1 6-4 Virginie Razzano #116 Match data Oct 21, 2010* R32 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Virginie Razzano #62 4-6 6-0 7-5 Anne Keothavong #53 Match data Jan 14, 2009* R16 Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Virginie Razzano #99 6-3 7-6(5) Anne Keothavong #290 Match data Jun 26, 2002* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 90 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne Keothavong
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,486 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,466 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,464 0 0
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,540 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,617 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 2012 6–18 25.0% #143 1,526 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,481 0 0
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne Keothavong
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 7 7 14 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 4 11 15 26.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 33 47 80 41.2% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 31 39 20.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 111/136 of Anne Keothavong's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne Keothavong
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/2 1.0 5.0 55.0% 54.5% 27.8% 50.0% 0.0% 42.5% 32.6%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% 2004 1/6 1.0 3.0 57.1% 50.0% 38.1% 44.4% 25.0% 44.9% 34.0%
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% 2005 1/4 0.0 2.0 59.1% 46.2% 22.2% 14.3% 100.0% 36.4% 31.6%
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% 2006 3/7 1.3 2.0 56.9% 47.1% 38.4% 35.5% 54.5% 43.8% 31.0%
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% 2007 8/8 1.9 4.0 52.9% 60.9% 38.8% 41.8% 52.7% 51.0% 45.5%
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% 2008 12/12 2.4 3.5 57.9% 61.2% 40.5% 43.7% 40.4% 52.6% 45.2%
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% 2009 24/28 2.6 3.0 58.7% 62.7% 45.1% 56.9% 43.0% 55.3% 44.6%
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% 2010 21/24 1.7 3.1 57.4% 58.4% 44.8% 44.3% 48.3% 52.3% 44.6%
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% 2011 15/17 1.4 3.7 58.8% 61.8% 48.1% 55.3% 52.1% 56.4% 44.6%
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% 2012 21/24 2.6 4.3 53.8% 57.4% 40.5% 43.9% 41.0% 49.7% 39.4%
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% 2013 4/4 2.0 3.8 56.5% 47.2% 45.0% 45.8% 35.8% 46.4% 37.4%
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 111/138 2.1 3.5 56.8% 59.2% 43.0% 47.8% 45.3% 52.2% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Anne Keothavong
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.13
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 2002 1476 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 2003 1465 96.7 -0.21 -0.44 0.567 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 2004 1486 100.8 -1.08 -0.67 0.618 39.6% — — -13 43.8% -0.81 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 2005 1467 93.4 -2.33 -1.56 0.496 34.1% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — +0.24
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 2006 1401 89.0 -3.21 -4.76 0.551 37.7% +51 — -4 6.7% -3.53 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 2007 1425 100.9 -2.40 +0.38 0.930 48.4% +60 — -67 44.4% -0.44 0–2 0–2 — +0.41
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 2008 1465 118.5 -1.50 +0.68 0.954 48.9% +49 — -108 35.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 +0.21
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2009 1540 114.7 -0.29 -0.29 0.999 50.0% +25 +44 -156 46.8% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 +1.51
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2010 1613 116.3 -2.69 +0.49 0.935 48.4% +3 -16 -248 44.6% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — -0.61
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 2011 1618 117.6 +0.58 +1.18 1.022 50.6% +10 — — 51.2% +0.15 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +0.35
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 2012 1527 113.8 -3.60 -2.34 0.783 44.5% +33 -4 -99 35.2% -1.00 1–7 (13%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.95
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 2013 1481 97.1 -3.69 -0.76 0.696 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.38 — — — -0.11
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1633 113.5 -1.76 -0.33 0.896 47.5% +25 +21 -101 39.3% -0.82 14–31 (31%) 13–12 (52%) 92.4 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.