H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Virginie Razzano vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 1-0
Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2001 Los Angeles third round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2001* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Virginie Razzano | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginie Razzano | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |