H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 2–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2003 Estoril third round 7-6(5) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 2003* Estoril WTA 250 R32 Clay Virginie Razzano #65 7-6(5) 6-0 Barbara Rittner #87 Match data
Oct 24, 2002* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #93 7-6(6) 6-1 Barbara Rittner #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —