H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 0-1

Conchita Martínez holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Conchita Martínez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2003 Indian Wells second round 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 7, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Conchita Martínez #30 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 Virginie Razzano #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33