H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 0-1

Emmanuelle Gagliardi holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2003 Miami Open round of 128 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Emmanuelle Gagliardi
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #86 6-4 6-0 Virginie Razzano #57 Match data Mar 20, 2003* R128 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 118 183 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Emmanuelle Gagliardi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 2000 13–20 39.4% #95 1,546 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,546 0 0
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,408 0 0
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 47 83 130 36.2% 59 76 135 43.7% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 32/135 of Emmanuelle Gagliardi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% 2003 5/48 2.2 1.0 58.2% 63.7% 37.7% 50.1% 43.2% 52.8% 41.8%
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% 2004 5/26 0.6 1.6 62.8% 59.3% 46.5% 44.8% 43.3% 54.0% 36.6%
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% 2005 5/25 2.6 4.0 59.1% 65.7% 44.8% 58.1% 45.5% 57.0% 42.8%
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% 2006 9/24 1.3 4.2 67.0% 59.1% 40.0% 31.3% 67.4% 52.8% 42.6%
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% 2007 7/11 0.4 3.1 65.3% 53.5% 47.4% 57.3% 34.3% 52.0% 37.1%
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% 2008 1/1 0.0 4.0 69.0% 57.5% 44.4% 42.9% 25.0% 53.4% 38.1%
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 32/301 1.3 3.0 63.4% 59.6% 43.2% 46.6% 47.9% 53.5% 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1995 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.03
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 1996 1504 108.4 — — — — — +73 — 62.5% +0.13 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.16
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 1997 1532 110.3 — — — — -57 +95 +68 47.5% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.0 +1.15
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 1998 1498 101.3 — — — — -92 +128 — 35.7% -1.26 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +1.10
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 1999 1563 123.3 — — — — — +85 +21 43.4% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.71
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 2000 1546 120.4 — — — — -122 +106 0 42.1% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 0.00
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 2001 1547 114.9 — — — — -78 +8 +74 42.6% -0.53 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.16
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2002 1584 127.0 — — — — -19 -57 — 46.5% -0.13 7–8 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 101.4 -0.34
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2003 1608 119.0 -1.11 -1.05 0.887 47.4% +3 -1 +6 49.1% -0.17 8–6 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 105.1 +1.34
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 2004 1525 104.1 -0.28 -2.38 0.796 45.6% -6 +29 +75 33.9% -1.36 3–6 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.11
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 2005 1506 106.9 +0.17 -1.19 0.996 50.0% -24 +72 — 38.2% -0.60 6–1 (86%) 1–3 (25%) 105.3 +0.98
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 2006 1470 101.7 -2.03 -1.17 0.901 47.9% -33 +50 +92 34.6% -0.96 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 +0.09
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 2007 1409 97.3 -2.52 -2.76 0.774 44.8% -23 +90 — 12.5% -2.50 1–1 — — +0.05
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 2008 1401 100.1 -0.04 -2.40 0.818 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 1696 117.4 -1.31 -1.73 0.865 47.0% -33 +56 +46 41.2% -0.60 45–59 (43%) 33–33 (50%) 100.5 +1.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.