H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-0

Virginie Razzano holds a 1–0 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 128 7-6(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
France Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Iva Majoli
CRO Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginie Razzano #101 7-6(5) 6-1 Iva Majoli #54 Match data Mar 6, 2002 R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,854 201 217 48.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,155 262 192 57.7% 1 3 0 4 0 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,735 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,921 0 0
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,481 0 0 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,045 0 2
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,578 0 0 1996 42–17 71.2% #7 2,038 0 4
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,657 0 0 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,946 1 7
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,612 0 0 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,593 0 0 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,606 0 0 2000 11–11 50.0% #62 1,695 1 7
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,593 0 0 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,806 0 2 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,667 1 8
25 2008 15–21 41.7% #58 1,634 0 2 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,606 1 8
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,788 0 2 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,579 1 8
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,680 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,632 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,682 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,656 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,646 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Virginie Razzano Iva Majoli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
16 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 16 7 23 69.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 3 17 82.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
18 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 4 19 78.9%
19 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 8 9 17 47.1% 19 4 23 82.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
20 2003 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 6 5 11 54.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2005 4 10 14 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 5 5 10 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2006 8 9 17 47.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2007 28 11 39 71.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 0 6 6 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2009 15 12 27 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 116 225 48.4% 64 67 131 48.9% 23 23 46 50.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — 85 81 166 51.2% 105 58 163 64.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 61 43 104 58.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/365 of Virginie Razzano's and 4/22 of Iva Majoli's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Virginie Razzano Iva Majoli
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/35 0.8 3.8 63.9% 64.9% 39.5% 53.6% 53.7% 55.6% 50.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/15 1.0 6.2 60.8% 62.6% 43.1% 56.8% 61.8% 55.3% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12/38 1.3 5.5 64.0% 63.5% 42.1% 57.4% 44.1% 55.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 20/28 1.0 4.6 66.9% 59.4% 45.1% 57.2% 45.7% 54.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 30/54 1.8 4.6 64.7% 61.1% 43.5% 53.3% 50.7% 55.0% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 30/36 1.9 4.5 64.0% 61.1% 43.0% 55.7% 50.1% 54.5% 44.0% 2003 4/22 0.3 6.8 62.8% 54.9% 25.6% 30.2% 29.7% 42.6% 36.8%
26 2009 47/51 1.8 3.5 64.6% 63.0% 48.1% 53.6% 45.8% 57.8% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 23/24 2.1 4.1 64.6% 59.7% 41.3% 49.3% 54.3% 53.2% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 25/26 1.8 4.2 65.7% 62.1% 42.1% 51.7% 50.1% 55.2% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 13/14 1.5 3.5 62.9% 59.8% 41.7% 56.8% 54.0% 53.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 13/17 1.9 4.6 66.1% 63.1% 48.1% 61.1% 46.5% 57.6% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 11/12 2.1 2.9 71.3% 61.8% 41.6% 54.4% 55.4% 55.9% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 6/6 1.0 4.7 73.6% 58.7% 52.3% 53.1% 55.2% 57.9% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/9 2.4 4.7 64.7% 62.8% 37.8% 49.2% 55.4% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 249/418 1.7 4.2 65.2% 61.6% 44.0% 54.2% 50.0% 55.4% 43.6% — 4/454 0.3 6.8 62.8% 54.9% 25.6% 30.2% 29.7% 42.6% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Virginie Razzano Iva Majoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1624 131.4 — — — — -1 -35 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.26
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1736 154.2 — — — — -24 -82 — 51.7% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 -0.69
16 1999 1484 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.23 1994 1922 155.6 — — — — -47 -71 -318 58.8% +0.37 18–6 (75%) 10–2 (83%) 116.4 -1.10
17 2000 1481 108.1 — — — — — +65 — 40.0% -0.53 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 +0.38 1995 2046 165.8 — — — — 0 -128 — 66.7% +1.21 8–6 (57%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 -0.04
18 2001 1579 126.2 — — — — -34 -3 +66 44.4% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 103.6 -0.70 1996 2038 166.9 — — — — +33 -42 -404 65.7% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–4 (73%) 105.7 -1.43
19 2002 1658 129.3 — — — — -42 -61 — 48.1% -0.35 3–3 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.2 -2.19 1997 1946 159.5 — — — — -16 +184 -241 60.5% +0.66 20–9 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 106.3 +1.31
20 2003 1613 121.0 -0.21 +2.36 1.133 52.9% -31 +1 +72 45.6% -0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 103.5 -0.11 1998 1829 148.6 — — — — -4 +251 — 52.7% 0.00 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 99.1 -0.16
21 2004 1594 104.5 -0.89 -1.63 0.911 48.4% -36 -11 +105 46.9% -0.69 1–3 (25%) 3–0 (100%) 100.4 +0.44 1999 1694 121.9 — — — — +5 +287 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.20
22 2005 1606 127.3 +0.37 +0.22 0.983 49.8% -74 +84 +60 41.2% -0.66 8–5 (62%) 3–8 (27%) 100.4 -0.08 2000 1695 114.9 — — — — -4 +192 — 42.3% -0.77 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 -0.36
23 2006 1594 129.9 -0.29 -1.94 0.897 48.2% +18 +21 — 40.9% -0.50 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 2001 1697 138.2 — — — — +23 +107 — 49.5% -0.19 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 -0.47
24 2007 1806 138.8 -0.54 +0.52 1.003 50.2% +49 -251 — 61.9% +0.91 9–4 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 109.3 +0.70 2002 1668 129.8 — — — — -45 +156 +61 51.9% -0.21 8–10 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 95.6 +0.77
25 2008 1635 123.8 -0.44 -0.24 0.968 49.5% +52 -83 -67 45.1% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +0.98 2003 1607 113.3 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -55 +133 — 35.3% -1.04 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 96.9 -0.94
26 2009 1789 138.2 +2.43 +0.57 1.037 51.0% -69 -109 -67 54.9% +0.62 8–4 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 100.1 -0.77 2004 1579 102.6 — — — — -48 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 — — -0.23
27 2010 1655 119.8 -2.12 -0.81 0.917 48.1% -4 -39 — 41.5% -0.92 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1681 123.8 +0.20 +0.19 0.970 49.6% -1 -65 -3 51.9% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1633 114.8 -1.74 -0.90 0.889 47.6% +11 +12 +24 39.3% -0.86 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1682 127.1 +0.95 -0.89 0.992 50.1% -10 -7 — 51.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1621 106.8 -0.91 +0.76 0.992 49.8% +5 +39 -17 41.4% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1656 110.4 +0.27 +1.25 1.081 51.4% — +28 — 75.0% +2.13 2–0 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1646 107.5 -0.91 +0.91 0.973 49.6% — +40 — 47.6% +0.19 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1581 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1572 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1855 132.0 +0.03 -0.04 0.978 49.7% -7 -34 +14 48.1% -0.12 66–62 (52%) 57–52 (52%) 104.4 -1.27 — 2155 156.1 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -9 +79 -234 55.0% +0.17 99–66 (60%) 62–43 (59%) 109.1 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.