H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginie Razzano vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 1-1
Virginie Razzano and Jelena Dokic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on clay, while Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2006 Australian Open first round 3-6 7-6(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Virginie Razzano | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2002* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-3 6-1 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginie Razzano | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |