H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Jill Craybas H2H: 5-1

Virginie Razzano holds a 5–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2009 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Virginie Razzano #23 6-3 6-0 Jill Craybas #90 Match data
Sep 27, 2007* Guangzhou WTA 500 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #39 6-3 1-6 6-1 Jill Craybas #95 Match data
Aug 24, 2007* Forest Hills WTA 250 R16 Hard Virginie Razzano #36 6-4 7-5 Jill Craybas #75 Match data
May 5, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Virginie Razzano #39 7-6(8) 3-6 7-5 Jill Craybas #93 Match data
Mar 24, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Jill Craybas #73 4-6 6-3 6-2 Virginie Razzano #56 Match data
Jan 15, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Virginie Razzano #78 7-6(7) 4-6 6-1 Jill Craybas #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1