H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Virginie Razzano vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2010 Auckland fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2010* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 3-6 6-3 6-2 Virginie Razzano #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Virginie Razzano Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8